<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jilting DxO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exposur.es/2009/11/10/jilting-dxo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exposur.es/2009/11/10/jilting-dxo/</link>
	<description>Dennis Wright&#039;s Photography Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wright</title>
		<link>http://exposur.es/2009/11/10/jilting-dxo/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exposur.es/?p=280#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that the very poor job done by DxO, compared with Lightroom, is far more apparent on the poxy TFT screen of my T61 Thinkpad than it is on better quality monitors.  It looks like the TFT screen tends to posterize or pixelate the image more and exaggerates the effect.

Maybe the DxO engineers have been calibrating their software using monitors which are too high in quality and so masking the problems.

Maybe I should try some prints and see how those compare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that the very poor job done by DxO, compared with Lightroom, is far more apparent on the poxy TFT screen of my T61 Thinkpad than it is on better quality monitors.  It looks like the TFT screen tends to posterize or pixelate the image more and exaggerates the effect.</p>
<p>Maybe the DxO engineers have been calibrating their software using monitors which are too high in quality and so masking the problems.</p>
<p>Maybe I should try some prints and see how those compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
